Globalization and innovation are two important concepts through-out various organizations and institutions that serve as driving forces producing great changes in the society. In order to surpass these external environmental challenges and demands, such as, political, economic, social and technological factors, the organizations’ goals and strategies should consistently align with each other. Successful organizations use several components, such as, employee partnership, self-empowered work teams and participation to dynamically adapt to their environment. As such, educational institutions should not be exempted. In addition, the researcher has observed the successes and failures of many institutions partly due to the impact of culture on the business management style of the institution. Universities being run as business organizations have the potential to be innovative and successful based on its cultural environment. However, despite the positivity of the impact of culture on universities, culture also has the great risks of causing failure of universities. As such, “Perceptions of the Impact of Culture on Universities’ Success as Business Entities” is derived as the Dissertation topic. The research seeks to investigate the correlation between culture and the success of universities. One recommendation of the study includes the necessity to carry out the research with a much larger group of participants of national cultures. This would help the results of the study to be of more significant value and hence present universities leaders with a better understanding on the impact of culture on their institutions.
雑誌名
CHUGOKUGAKUEN Journal
巻
20
ページ
37 - 43
発行年
2021
出版者
中国学園大学/中国短期大学
出版者（英）
Chugokugakuen University / Chugoku Junior College
ISSN
1348-1452
書誌レコードID
AA11806612
権利
中国学園大学/中国短期大学
情報源
Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Garro, L. & Mattingly, C. (2000). Narrative and the cultural construction of illness and healing. University of California Press.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014112
Hofstede, G. (2013). Values Survey Model (VSM) 2013. Retrieved from http://geerthofstede.nl/vsm2013
Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2013). Values Survey Model 2013 manual. Retrieved from www. geerthofstede.eu The Hofstede Centre. (n.d.). National culture. Retrieved from http://geerthofstede.com/national-culture.html
Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K., & Young, D. P. (1999). High-performance work organizations: Definitions, practices, and an annotated bibliography. Center for Creative Leadership.
Taylor, E. (1871). Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. Bradbury, Evans, & Co. Printers.
Wu, M. (2016). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions 30 years later: A study of Taiwan and the United States. Intercultural Communication Studies, 15(1), p.33.
Perceptions of the Impact of Culture on Universities’ Success: A Dissertation Quantitative Partial Findings
20_037_043.pdf
(217.42KB)
